Quadro 3000M X2 vs Tesla T4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking200not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.35no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU104EXMF104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 September 2018 (6 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560240
Core clock speed585 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate254.418.00
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16040
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.52.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2018 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 150 Watt

Tesla T4 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T4 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla T4 is a workstation card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 228 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.