Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Tesla T4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX CMP 40HX CMP 50HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 RTX 8000 T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 Tesla T4
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla T4 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Tesla T4
2018
16 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
24.16
+57.8%

T4 outperforms 7-Cores iGPU by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.62no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameTU104Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 September 2018 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25607
Core clock speed585 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1590 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate254.4no data
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+47.1%
34
−47.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Tesla T4 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T4 is 47% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.16 15.31
Recency 13 September 2018 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

Tesla T4 has a 57.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 7-Cores iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 7-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla T4 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
L4 L4
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7 Core iGPU
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
RTX 3060 GA104 RTX 3060 GA104
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
520 OEM 520 OEM
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
520 Mobile DDR3 520 Mobile DDR3
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
RTX 3090 Ti RTX 3090 Ti
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
GB10 GB10
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
Jetson T5000 Jetson T5000
P2000 Max-Q P2000 Max-Q
vs
9300 GS Rev. 2 9300 GS Rev. 2
P2000 Max-Q P2000 Max-Q
vs
ATI FireGL X1-256 FireGL X1 256

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 265 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 109 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T4 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.