Radeon HD 6990M vs Tesla T10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 6000 6000 Passive 8000 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6950M 6970M 6970M Crossfire 6970M Mac Edition 6970M Rebrand 6970M X2 6990M 6990M Crossfire 6990M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla T10 with Radeon HD 6990M, including specs and performance data.

Tesla T10
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
28.13
+516%

T10 outperforms HD 6990M by a whopping 516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
HD 6990M HD 6990M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking227700
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.333.52
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTU102Blackcomb
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data12 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081120
Core clock speedno data715 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate449.340.04
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS1.602 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28856
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed13 GB/s900 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+456%
54
−456%
Full HD350−400
+483%
60
−483%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Tesla T10 and HD 6990M compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T10 is 456% faster in 900p
  • Tesla T10 is 483% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.13 4.57
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 100 Watt

Tesla T10 has a 515.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6990M, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Tesla T10 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla T10 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6990M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla T10
Tesla T10
AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
HD 6990M Radeon HD 6990M
vs
GTX 460M SLI GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Pro V7300X Radeon Pro V7300X
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
GT 645M GeForce GT 645M
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
HD 7590M Radeon HD 7590M
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
RX 460 Mobile Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Go 7800 GTX SLI GeForce Go 7800 GTX SLI
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Go 7900 GTX GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
GT 120M GeForce GT 120M
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
ATI Mobility 9200 Mobility Radeon 9200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 5 votes

Rate Tesla T10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T10 or Radeon HD 6990M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.