Quadro M4000 vs Tesla T10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla T10 and Quadro M4000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tesla T10
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
29.97
+88%

Tesla T10 outperforms M4000 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.32
Power efficiency8.7810.12
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTU102GM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release dateno data29 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081664
Core clock speedno data773 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate449.380.39
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS2.573 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288104

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1 x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed13 GB/s1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/sUp to 192 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA7.55.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla T10 29.97
+88%
Quadro M4000 15.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla T10 12557
+88%
Quadro M4000 6679

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.97 15.94
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 120 Watt

Tesla T10 has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M4000, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Tesla T10 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T10
Tesla T10
NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Tesla T10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 268 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T10 or Quadro M4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.