GeForce GTX 465 vs Tesla T10
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla T10 with GeForce GTX 465, including specs and performance data.
T10 outperforms GTX 465 by a whopping 373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 213 | 618 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.07 |
| Power efficiency | 8.87 | 2.44 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | TU102 | GF100 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | no data | 31 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $279 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4608 | 352 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 18,600 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 449.3 | 26.75 |
| Floating-point processing power | 14.38 TFLOPS | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| Compute performance | no data | 30x |
| ROPs | 96 | 32 |
| TMUs | 288 | 44 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 13 GB/s | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Memory bandwidth | 624.0 GB/s | 102.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 29.75 | 6.29 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 200 Watt |
Tesla T10 has a 373% higher aggregate performance score, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
GTX 465, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.
The Tesla T10 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 465 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla T10 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
