ATI Radeon X1050 vs Tesla P4

Place in the ranking	294	1508
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.48	0.39
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code name	GP104	RV370
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 September 2016 (9 years ago)	7 December 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	no data
Core clock speed	886 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	24 Watt
Texture fill rate	178.2	1.600
Floating-point processing power	5.704 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	160	4
L1 Cache	960 KB	no data
L2 Cache	2 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	333 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla P4 21.90
+18150%

ATI X1050 0.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla P4 9145
+18563%

Samples: 57

ATI X1050 49
Samples: 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.90	0.12
Recency	13 September 2016	7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	24 Watt

Tesla P4 has a 18150% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1050, on the other hand, has 213% lower power consumption.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1050 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1050 is a desktop one.