Radeon 840M vs Tesla P4

Place in the ranking	293	517
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.04	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code name	GP104	Krackan Point
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 September 2016 (9 years ago)	2 June 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	256
Core clock speed	886 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	178.2	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.704 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	160	no data
L1 Cache	960 KB	no data
L2 Cache	2 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	7500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla P4 21.52
+137%

Radeon 840M 9.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla P4 9004
+137%

Samples: 50

Radeon 840M 3803
Samples: 296

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

65−70
+132%

−132%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	84 +0%	84 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	68 +0%	68 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	15 +0%	15 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

55−60

+0%

55−60

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%