Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.89
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP100no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1190 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1329 MHzno data
Number of transistors15,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate297.7no data
Floating-point processing power9.526 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs224no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width3072 Bitno data
Memory clock speed715 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth549.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 3471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB and Qualcomm Adreno 685. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB is a workstation card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.