Radeon PRO W7900 vs Tesla P10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated26
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.38
Power efficiencyno data17.36
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 September 2016 (9 years ago)13 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38406144
Core clock speed1025 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate358.3958.1
Floating-point processing power11.47 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs240384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cache1.4 MB3 MB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1808 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth694.3 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 295 Watt

Tesla P10 has 97% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P10 and Radeon PRO W7900. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Tesla P10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 87 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P10 or Radeon PRO W7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.