Radeon R5 M430 vs Tesla M60

Place in performance ranking	269	896
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.82	0.04
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	GM204	Mars
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 August 2015 (8 years ago)	1 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price	$81	$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M60 has 19450% better value for money than R5 M430.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	320
Core clock speed	557 MHz	955 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	150.8	17.10
Floating-point performance	2x 4,833 gflops	659.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M60 and Radeon R5 M430 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1746 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M60 19.55
+1064%

R5 M430 1.68

Tesla M60 outperforms Radeon R5 M430 by 1064% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla M60 7551
+1065%

R5 M430 648

Tesla M60 outperforms Radeon R5 M430 by 1065% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

200−210
+1011%

−1011%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50
+1025%

4−5

−1025%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Hitman 3	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +1054%	12−14 −1054%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Hitman 3	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +1054%	12−14 −1054%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +1033%	14−16 −1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +1054%	12−14 −1054%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+900%

3−4

−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Hitman 3	80−85 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+1025%

4−5

−1025%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +1025%	4−5 −1025%