RTX A3000 Mobile vs Tesla M60
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla M60 with RTX A3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms Tesla M60 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 268 | 154 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.82 | no data |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | GM204 | GA104 |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 (8 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Current price | $81 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 17,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 237.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Tesla M60 and RTX A3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 5.2 | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 55−60
−78.2%
| 98
+78.2%
|
1440p | 24−27
−83.3%
| 44
+83.3%
|
4K | 27−30
−70.4%
| 46
+70.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−71.1%
|
77
+71.1%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−68.6%
|
55−60
+68.6%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 45−50
−75.6%
|
79
+75.6%
|
Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−76.7%
|
100−110
+76.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−67.5%
|
65−70
+67.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−88.6%
|
66
+88.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−82.5%
|
70−75
+82.5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−84.4%
|
80−85
+84.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−76%
|
130−140
+76%
|
Hitman 3 | 40−45
−67.5%
|
65−70
+67.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 95−100
−72.6%
|
164
+72.6%
|
Metro Exodus | 55−60
−81.8%
|
100−105
+81.8%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−82.2%
|
80−85
+82.2%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 95−100
−72.6%
|
164
+72.6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
−69.1%
|
93
+69.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−68.6%
|
55−60
+68.6%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
−70%
|
68
+70%
|
Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−76.7%
|
100−110
+76.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−67.5%
|
65−70
+67.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
−76.7%
|
53
+76.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−82.5%
|
70−75
+82.5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−84.4%
|
80−85
+84.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−76%
|
130−140
+76%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
39
+85.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 75−80
−74.7%
|
130−140
+74.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
−81.5%
|
49
+81.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−82.2%
|
80−85
+82.2%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 80−85
−67.5%
|
134
+67.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90−95
−67.8%
|
151
+67.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 50−55
−72%
|
85−90
+72%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−68.6%
|
55−60
+68.6%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−33
−70%
|
51
+70%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−67.5%
|
65−70
+67.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−79.2%
|
43
+79.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−82.5%
|
70−75
+82.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−76%
|
130−140
+76%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70
−75.4%
|
114
+75.4%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 65−70
−75.4%
|
114
+75.4%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
−74.3%
|
61
+74.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
−85.7%
|
39
+85.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
−82.2%
|
80−85
+82.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−77.1%
|
60−65
+77.1%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−85%
|
70−75
+85%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20
−94.4%
|
35−40
+94.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−94.4%
|
35−40
+94.4%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
−77.8%
|
45−50
+77.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27
+68.8%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−72.5%
|
69
+72.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−67.5%
|
65−70
+67.5%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
−70.8%
|
40−45
+70.8%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
−72.5%
|
65−70
+72.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
−77.1%
|
60−65
+77.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
−72%
|
86
+72%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−83.3%
|
40−45
+83.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27−30
+68.8%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−86.7%
|
55−60
+86.7%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−77.8%
|
30−35
+77.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27−30
+68.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
−85.7%
|
24−27
+85.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40−45
+90.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
−78.6%
|
24−27
+78.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−87.5%
|
45
+87.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−87.5%
|
45−50
+87.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40−45
+90.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
−83.3%
|
30−35
+83.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9−10
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−75%
|
27−30
+75%
|
This is how Tesla M60 and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A3000 Mobile is 78% faster in 1080p
- RTX A3000 Mobile is 83% faster in 1440p
- RTX A3000 Mobile is 70% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 19.55 | 32.64 |
Recency | 30 August 2015 | 12 April 2021 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 130 Watt |
The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M60 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.