Quadro M5000M vs Tesla M60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M60 with Quadro M5000M, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M60
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
19.55
+8.9%

Tesla M60 outperforms M5000M by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking268287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.828.13
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGM204GM204
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date30 August 2015 (8 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$81 $468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M5000M has 4% better value for money than Tesla M60.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481,536
Core clock speed557 MHz962 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1051 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate150.893.60
Floating-point performance2x 4,833 gflops2,995 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M60 and Quadro M5000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA5.25.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M60 19.55
+8.9%
M5000M 17.95

Tesla M60 outperforms Quadro M5000M by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla M60 7551
+8.9%
M5000M 6932

Tesla M60 outperforms Quadro M5000M by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+2.6%
78
−2.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+8.4%
80−85
−8.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.6%
70−75
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+8.4%
80−85
−8.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.6%
70−75
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+4.5%
67
−4.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+8.4%
80−85
−8.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.6%
70−75
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+5.3%
38
−5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+7.1%
55−60
−7.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Tesla M60 and M5000M compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M60 is 3% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.55 17.95
Recency 30 August 2015 2 October 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 100 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla M60 and Quadro M5000M.

Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation card while Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M60
Tesla M60
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 40 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 129 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.