Arc A380 vs Tesla M60

Place in performance ranking	269	174
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.82	14.17
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM204	DG2-128
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2015 (8 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149
Current price	$81	$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A380 has 81% better value for money than Tesla M60.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Core clock speed	557 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	150.8	131.2
Floating-point performance	2x 4,833 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	222 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M60 19.55

Arc A380 29.74
+52.1%

Arc A380 outperforms Tesla M60 by 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla M60 7551
+21%

Arc A380 6238

Tesla M60 outperforms Arc A380 by 21% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

27−30

−66.7%

45
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −52.5%	61 +52.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −66.7%	50 +66.7%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −61.7%	95−100 +61.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −68.9%	75−80 +68.9%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −68.9%	76 +68.9%
Hitman 3	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −55.4%	101 +55.4%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −55%	90−95 +55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −54%	75−80 +54%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −56.7%	94 +56.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −57.1%	55 +57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −66.7%	50 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −54.2%	37 +54.2%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −61.7%	95−100 +61.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −68.9%	75−80 +68.9%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
Hitman 3	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −57.3%	110−120 +57.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −66.7%	30 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −54%	75−80 +54%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −60%	80 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −65%	66 +65%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −60%	80−85 +60%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −61.1%	29 +61.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −72.2%	31 +72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −62.9%	57 +62.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −73.3%	52 +73.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −52.5%	61 +52.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −61.9%	34 +61.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −56.3%	25 +56.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−54%

75−80
+54%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −60%	55−60 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −65%	65−70 +65%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −55.6%	40−45 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −73.3%	50−55 +73.3%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%
Hitman 3	21−24 −71.4%	35−40 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −55%	60−65 +55%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −62.9%	55−60 +62.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −70%	65−70 +70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−66.7%

50−55
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Hitman 3	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −61.9%	30−35 +61.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−62.5%

24−27
+62.5%

This is how Tesla M60 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.55	29.74
Recency	30 August 2015	14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	75 Watt