AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating	215	216
Value for money	17.92	4.04
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM204	Navi 14
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 August 2015 (7 years old)	4 August 2020 (2 years old)
Current price	$350	$3649

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1280
Core clock speed	930 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	100 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	113.3	132.0
Floating-point performance	3,625 gflops	no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	MXM Module	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	224.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

No outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.2	no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

---

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance rating	19.10	19.06
Recency	30 August 2015	4 August 2020
Memory bus width	256	128
Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1280
Memory bandwidth	160.4	224
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	100 Watt	85 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---