GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Tesla M6

Place in performance ranking	310	8
Place by popularity	not in top-100	35
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.87	33.13
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GM204	AD104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2015 (8 years ago)	17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$699
Current price	$350	$719 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 274% better value for money than Tesla M6.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	7168
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	113.3	584.6
Floating-point performance	3,625 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	285 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M6 16.27

RTX 4070 SUPER 77.65
+377%

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms Tesla M6 by 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla M6 6284

RTX 4070 SUPER 29988
+377%

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms Tesla M6 by 377% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −420%	208 +420%
1440p	27−30 −404%	136 +404%
4K	16−18 −419%	83 +419%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −413%	120−130 +413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −415%	130−140 +415%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −388%	240−250 +388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −392%	110−120 +392%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −385%	190−200 +385%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −429%	230−240 +429%
Hitman 3	24−27 −413%	120−130 +413%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −405%	300−350 +405%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −390%	140−150 +390%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −417%	120−130 +417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −382%	434 +382%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −383%	169 +383%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −413%	120−130 +413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −415%	130−140 +415%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −388%	240−250 +388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −392%	110−120 +392%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −385%	190−200 +385%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −429%	230−240 +429%
Hitman 3	24−27 −413%	120−130 +413%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −405%	300−350 +405%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −390%	140−150 +390%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −417%	120−130 +417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −404%	428 +404%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −385%	412 +385%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −422%	140−150 +422%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −413%	120−130 +413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −415%	130−140 +415%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −392%	110−120 +392%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −429%	230−240 +429%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −405%	300−350 +405%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −408%	381 +408%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −403%	201 +403%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −415%	139 +415%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
−417%

120−130

+417%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −453%	160−170 +453%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −380%	140−150 +380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −411%	90−95 +411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −429%	110−120 +429%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −423%	183 +423%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −390%	190−200 +390%
Hitman 3	21−24 −443%	110−120 +443%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −415%	200−210 +415%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −417%	120−130 +417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −382%	265 +382%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −413%	154 +413%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −414%	108 +414%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
−408%

120−130

+408%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −389%	85−90 +389%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −393%	65−70 +393%
Hitman 3	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −421%	120−130 +421%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −422%	94 +422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −393%	133 +393%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −379%	65−70 +379%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −433%	60−65 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −420%	50−55 +420%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −393%	140−150 +393%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −421%	120−130 +421%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −428%	95−100 +428%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −417%	62 +417%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−400%

90−95
+400%

This is how Tesla M6 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 420% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 404% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 419% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.27	77.65
Recency	30 August 2015	17 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	220 Watt