Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs Tesla M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M40 with Arc 8-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M40
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
26.87
+48.1%

Tesla M40 outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking186284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation84.86no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Xe LPG
GPU code nameGM200Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2015 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30728
Core clock speed948 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1112 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.5no data
Floating-point performance6,844 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M40 and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data
CUDA5.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
+37.5%
40
−37.5%
1440p21−24
+31.3%
16
−31.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+44.1%
55−60
−44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+35.1%
37
−35.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+42.9%
45−50
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+42.9%
80−85
−42.9%
Hitman 3 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+36.4%
33
−36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+40%
50−55
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+46.6%
55−60
−46.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+42.9%
55−60
−42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+44.1%
55−60
−44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+42.9%
35
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+42.9%
45−50
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+42.9%
80−85
−42.9%
Hitman 3 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+47.5%
60−65
−47.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+40%
50−55
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+46.6%
55−60
−46.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+39.5%
43
−39.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+42.9%
55−60
−42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+45.2%
30−35
−45.2%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+44.1%
55−60
−44.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+36.4%
33
−36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+42.9%
45−50
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+42.9%
80−85
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+30.4%
23
−30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+42.9%
55−60
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Hitman 3 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+35.1%
35−40
−35.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+36.4%
30−35
−36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Hitman 3 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how Tesla M40 and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M40 is 38% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla M40 is 31% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.87 18.14
Recency 10 November 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M40 is a workstation card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M40
Tesla M40
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 76 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.