Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Tesla M2090

Place in the ranking	462	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	89
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	77.25
Power efficiency	2.63	16.15
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF110	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2048
Core clock speed	651 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	352.6
Floating-point processing power	1.332 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	64	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	248 mm	204 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	924 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.50	44.33
Recency	25 July 2011	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt

RX 7600 XT has a 366.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.