Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) A265 A360 M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M365X M370 M380 M440 M445 M460 M465 M465X Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2090 with Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2090
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
8.77
+387%

M2090 outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
R7 (Bristol Ridge) R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking529964
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.693.07
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.2 (2016)
GPU code nameGF110Bristol Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed651 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66no data
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+364%
14
−364%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+0%
5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Tesla M2090 and R7 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M2090 is 364% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.77 1.80
Recency 25 July 2011 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 12 Watt

Tesla M2090 has a 387.2% higher aggregate performance score.

R7 (Bristol Ridge), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
P104-100 P104 100
R7 (Bristol Ridge) Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
vs
R7 (Carrizo) Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
PCX 5900 GeForce PCX 5900
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
E9173 PCIe Radeon E9173 PCIe
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
GT 340 OEM GeForce GT 340 OEM
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
ATI V8750 FirePro V8750
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
GT 530 OEM GeForce GT 530 OEM
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
GT 340 OEM GeForce GT 340 OEM
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
NVS 5100M NVS 5100M
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB A800 PCIe 40 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2090 or Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.