GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Tesla M2090

Place in performance ranking	430	8
Place by popularity	not in top-100	42
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.53	32.71
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GF110	AD104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$699
Current price	$1844	$719 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 6072% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	7168
Core clock speed	651 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	584.6
Floating-point performance	1,331.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	248 mm	285 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	3696 MHz	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.0	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −796%	215 +796%
1440p	14−16 −836%	131 +836%
4K	10−12 −720%	82 +720%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.47	77.64
Recency	25 July 2011	17 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	220 Watt