GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Tesla M2090
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla M2090 with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms Tesla M2090 by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 512 | 158 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 16 |
Power efficiency | 2.66 | 52.38 |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | GF110 | AD107 |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 25 July 2011 (14 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1755 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 18,900 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 140.4 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.332 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 48 | 48 |
TMUs | 64 | 80 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 248 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 924 MHz | 16000 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
CUDA | 2.0 | 8.9 |
DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 24−27
−296%
| 95
+296%
|
1440p | 12−14
−308%
| 49
+308%
|
4K | 7−8
−329%
| 30
+329%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 103
+0%
|
103
+0%
|
God of War | 117
+0%
|
117
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 166
+0%
|
166
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 82
+0%
|
82
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 124
+0%
|
124
+0%
|
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 115
+0%
|
115
+0%
|
God of War | 93
+0%
|
93
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Valorant | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 169
+0%
|
169
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 114
+0%
|
114
+0%
|
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 108
+0%
|
108
+0%
|
God of War | 75
+0%
|
75
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 125
+0%
|
125
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 85
+0%
|
85
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 156
+0%
|
156
+0%
|
Valorant | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 65
+0%
|
65
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 162
+0%
|
162
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 107
+0%
|
107
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
God of War | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 80
+0%
|
80
+0%
|
Valorant | 138
+0%
|
138
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 79
+0%
|
79
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 58
+0%
|
58
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Valorant | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
God of War | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 58
+0%
|
58
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 60
+0%
|
60
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 45
+0%
|
45
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45
+0%
|
45
+0%
|
Valorant | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 115
+0%
|
115
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
God of War | 28
+0%
|
28
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
This is how Tesla M2090 and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 4050 Mobile is 296% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4050 Mobile is 308% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4050 Mobile is 329% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.74 | 34.38 |
Recency | 25 July 2011 | 3 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
RTX 4050 Mobile has a 293.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.