GMA X3100 vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking529not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.69no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGF110Broadwater
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed651 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate41.664.000
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPSno data
ROPs481
TMUs648
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed924 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 13 Watt

Tesla M2090 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3100, on the other hand, has 1823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2090 and GMA X3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while GMA X3100 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
Intel GMA X3100
GMA X3100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 99 votes

Rate GMA X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2090 or GMA X3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.