GMA 3150 vs Tesla M2090
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 530 | 1603 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.69 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Generation 4.0 (2006−2007) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Pineview |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (14 years ago) | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 123 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 0.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.332 TFLOPS | 0.0128 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 1 |
| TMUs | 64 | 2 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 248 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 924 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2011 | 9 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 13 Watt |
Tesla M2090 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.
GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1823.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla M2090 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
