UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Tesla M2070-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2070-Q with UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2070-Q
2011, $5,489
6 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
3.12
+8.3%

M2070-Q outperforms Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking798820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.078.85
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGF100Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)28 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,489 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44832
Core clock speed574 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14no data
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed783 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%
4K9−10
+0%
9
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p392.07no data
4K609.89no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Tesla M2070-Q and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M2070-Q is 8% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.12 2.88
Recency 25 July 2011 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 12 Watt

Tesla M2070-Q has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1775% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla M2070-Q and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).

Be aware that Tesla M2070-Q is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Tesla M2070-Q
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
FireStream 9270 FireStream 9270
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
vs
A10M
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
HD Graphics P530 P530
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
GeForce 720A 720A
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
NVS 295 295
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
GRID M60-2Q M60-2Q
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
UHD Graphics G1 G1
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
UHD Graphics G4 G4
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
UHD Graphics G7 G7
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile G4 48EU Mobile
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile G7 64EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla M2070-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 396 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2070-Q or UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.