GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Tesla M2070-Q

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
GTX 1660 Max-Q GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2070-Q with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2070-Q
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.92

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Tesla M2070-Q by a whopping 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking744258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0369.52
Power efficiency1.0325.96
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,489 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 231633% better value for money than Tesla M2070-Q.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481536
Core clock speed574 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14128.2
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs5696

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla M2070-Q 2.92
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 19.72
+575%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla M2070-Q 1305
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+575%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−690%
79
+690%
4K4−5
−725%
33
+725%

Cost per frame, $

1080p548.90
−18836%
2.90
+18836%
4K1372.25
−19675%
6.94
+19675%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 18836% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 19675% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Tesla M2070-Q and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 690% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 725% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.92 19.72
Recency 25 July 2011 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a 575.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2070-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2070-Q is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Tesla M2070-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070 Q
vs
FireStream 9270 FireStream 9270
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070 Q
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
8800 GT Mac Edition 8800 GT Mac Edition
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
vs
RTX 3070 RTX 3070
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070 Q
vs
Tesla K80m Tesla K80m
Tesla S2050 Tesla S2050
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Tesla X2070 Tesla X2070
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700
4000 Mac Edition 4000 Mac Edition
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
Quadro 5000 5000
vs
R7 350 R7 350
Quadro 5000 5000
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla M2070-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 568 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2070-Q or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.