RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Tesla M10

Place in performance ranking	479	15
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.38	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GM107	Ada Lovelace
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2016 (8 years ago)	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,799
Current price	$1999	$9290 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M10 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	18176
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	1306 MHz	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.24	1,423
Floating-point performance	4x 1,672 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	8.9
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 bit Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.0	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M10 8.21

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 73.10
+790%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Tesla M10 by 790% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla M10 3171

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28230
+790%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Tesla M10 by 790% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −824%	194 +824%
1440p	18−20 −794%	161 +794%
4K	12−14 −883%	118 +883%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −867%	110−120 +867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −821%	120−130 +821%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −879%	230−240 +879%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −900%	120−130 +900%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −883%	110−120 +883%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −900%	180−190 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −842%	220−230 +842%
Hitman 3	12−14 −925%	120−130 +925%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −930%	300−350 +930%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −806%	140−150 +806%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −933%	120−130 +933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −880%	300−350 +880%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −886%	130−140 +886%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −867%	110−120 +867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −821%	120−130 +821%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −879%	230−240 +879%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −900%	120−130 +900%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −883%	110−120 +883%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −900%	180−190 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −842%	220−230 +842%
Hitman 3	12−14 −925%	120−130 +925%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −930%	300−350 +930%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −817%	55 +817%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −933%	120−130 +933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −880%	300−350 +880%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −878%	489 +878%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −886%	130−140 +886%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −867%	110−120 +867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −821%	120−130 +821%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −900%	120−130 +900%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −883%	110−120 +883%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −842%	220−230 +842%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −930%	300−350 +930%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −880%	300−350 +880%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −863%	260 +863%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −886%	130−140 +886%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−933%

120−130
+933%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −822%	160−170 +822%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −800%	140−150 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −856%	85−90 +856%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −830%	90−95 +830%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −808%	100−110 +808%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −883%	118 +883%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −894%	170−180 +894%
Hitman 3	12−14 −792%	100−110 +792%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −800%	180−190 +800%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −890%	99 +890%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −910%	210−220 +910%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −813%	219 +813%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −811%	80−85 +811%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
−883%

110−120

+883%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −878%	85−90 +878%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −886%	65−70 +886%
Hitman 3	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −861%	173 +861%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −814%	128 +814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −922%	184 +922%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −933%	60−65 +933%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −867%	55−60 +867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −836%	130−140 +836%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −858%	110−120 +858%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −880%	98 +880%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −860%	45−50 +860%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−800%

80−85

+800%

This is how Tesla M10 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 824% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 794% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 883% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.21	73.10
Recency	18 May 2016	3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	300 Watt