Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Tesla K80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Tesla K10 Tesla K20c Tesla K20m Tesla K20X Tesla K20Xm Tesla K40c Tesla K40m Tesla K40s Tesla K40st Tesla K40t Tesla K80 Tesla K80m
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K80 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K80
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
15.23

T1200 Mobile outperforms Tesla K80 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tesla K80 Tesla K80
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking360300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.4874.12
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK210TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496 ×21024
Core clock speed562 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate171.4 ×291.20
Floating-point processing power4.113 TFLOPS ×22.918 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×232
TMUs208 ×264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/s ×2160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.77.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−28.9%
58
+28.9%
1440p24−27
−37.5%
33
+37.5%
4K60−65
−35%
81
+35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how Tesla K80 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 35% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.23 19.46
Recency 17 November 2014 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 18 Watt

Tesla K80 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 27.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
RX 5600M RX 5600M
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
HD 7770 HD 7770
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Playstation 5 GPU 5 GPU
RX 550X Mobile Radeon RX 550X Mobile
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Xe Graphics G4
RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU Pro 14-Core GPU
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 2070 Mobile 2070 Mobile
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
HD 7790 HD 7790

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 185 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.