GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Tesla K80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K10 K20c K20m K20s K20X K20Xm K40c K40d K40m K40s K80 K80m
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K80 with GeForce GTX 765M SLI, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K80
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
12.76
+31.1%

K80 outperforms 765M SLI by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
GTX 765M SLI GTX 765M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking423486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.285.77
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK210no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)30 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496 ×21536
Core clock speed562 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 million2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate171.4 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power4.113 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs48 ×2no data
TMUs208 ×2no data
L1 Cache208 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB ×22x 2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×22x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.7+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+26.8%
71
−26.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 197
+0%
197
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Tesla K80 and GTX 765M SLI compete in popular games:

  • Tesla K80 is 27% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.76 9.73
Recency 17 November 2014 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 130 Watt

Tesla K80 has a 31.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

GTX 765M SLI, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Tesla K80 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
GTX 765M SLI GeForce GTX 765M SLI
vs
RX 460 Mobile Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
Ice Lake GT3e Ice Lake GT3e
vs
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
Iris Plus Graphics 950 Iris Plus Graphics 950
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Pro Vega 64X Pro Vega 64X
vs
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT
Gemini Lake GT1 5 Gemini Lake GT1 5
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
GTX 760M GTX 760M
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
R7 260X R7 260X
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 185 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80 or GeForce GTX 765M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.