Arc Pro A60 vs Tesla K80

Place in the ranking	365	247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.47	12.72
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GK210	DG2-256
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	17 November 2014 (10 years ago)	6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2496 ×2	2048
Core clock speed	562 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	824 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	7,100 million	11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.4 ×2	262.4
Floating-point processing power	4.113 TFLOPS ×2	8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs	48 ×2	64
TMUs	208 ×2	128
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB ×2	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit ×2	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	240.6 GB/s ×2	384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.7	-
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla K80 13.10

Arc Pro A60 20.81
+58.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla K80 5852

Arc Pro A60 9300
+58.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.10	20.81
Recency	17 November 2014	6 June 2023
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	130 Watt

Arc Pro A60 has a 58.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Arc Pro A60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K80 in performance tests.