HD Graphics 4000 vs Tesla K8

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K220Q K240Q K260Q K280Q K520 Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 3000 4000 4200 4400 4600 5000 5300 5500 5600 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K8 with HD Graphics 4000, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K8
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
8.52
+727%

K8 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5101119
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiency6.861.84
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGK104Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 September 2014 (11 years ago)14 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536128
Core clock speed693 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed811 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate103.816.00
Floating-point processing power2.491 TFLOPS0.256 TFLOPS
ROPs322
TMUs12816
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95−100
+692%
12
−692%
Full HD90−95
+718%
11
−718%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Tesla K8 and HD Graphics 4000 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla K8 is 692% faster in 900p
  • Tesla K8 is 718% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.52 1.03
Recency 16 September 2014 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

Tesla K8 has a 727.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

HD Graphics 4000, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla K8 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K8 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla K8
Tesla K8
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
vs
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
ATI FireGL V7700 FireGL V7700
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000
Arc Pro B60 Intel Pro B60
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
GTX 1650 GDDR6 NVIDIA GTX 1650 GDDR6
vs
Quadro K1200 K1200
RX 6600 AMD RX 6600
vs
Quadro K1200 K1200
K1100M Quadro K1100M
vs
Tesla K8 K8
GTS 450 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
Quadro K2200 K2200
HD Graphics 2000 Intel Graphics 2000
vs
Quadro K420 K420
ATI FireMV 2260 FireMV 2260
vs
Quadro K420 K420
GTX 1650 GDDR6 NVIDIA GTX 1650 GDDR6
vs
Quadro K4200 K4200
RTX 5080 NVIDIA RTX 5080
vs
Quadro K4200 K4200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 3 votes

Rate Tesla K8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 5787 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K8 or HD Graphics 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.