Radeon 680M vs Tesla K40c

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K40c with Radeon 680M, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K40c
2013
12 GB GDDR5, 245 Watt
11.64

Radeon 680M outperforms Tesla K40c by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking381294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.37no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK180RDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data
Current price$360 (0x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880768
Core clock speed745 MHzno data
Boost clock speed876 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate210.2115.2
Floating-point performance4,291 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla K40c and Radeon 680M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed6008 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.2
CUDA3.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K40c 11.64
Radeon 680M 17.36
+49.1%

Radeon 680M outperforms Tesla K40c by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla K40c 4494
Radeon 680M 6166
+37.2%

Radeon 680M outperforms Tesla K40c by 37% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−58.3%
38
+58.3%
1440p12−14
−50%
18
+50%
4K6−7
−50%
9
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
−41%
55−60
+41%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−49.1%
85−90
+49.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
Hitman 3 32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 79
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 39
−41%
55−60
+41%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−49.1%
85−90
+49.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
Hitman 3 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Metro Exodus 18
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 43
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Hitman 3 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

This is how Tesla K40c and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 680M is 58% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 680M is 50% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 680M is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 17.36
Recency 8 October 2013 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 45 Watt

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K40c in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K40c is a workstation card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Tesla K40c
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Tesla K40c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 867 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.