NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs Quadro K4200
Comparison of Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200 architecture, market type and release date.
Perfomance to price
8 October 2013
22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)
Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
178.8 GTexel / s
87.81 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
288.4 GB / s
172.8 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200.
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200, sometimes including their particular versions.
Video card benchmarks performance comparison
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Octane Render OctaneBench
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
324 Mh/s +172.3%
119 Mh/s −172.3%
Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Wider memory bus (384 vs 256 bit)
More pipelines (2880 vs 1344)
Higher memory bandwidth (288.4 vs 172.8 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K4200
0.4% faster in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (22 July 2014 vs 8 October 2013)
Cheaper ($854.99 vs $7699)
Less power hungry (108 vs 245 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, Tesla K40c or Quadro K4200?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Tesla K40c and NVIDIA Quadro K4200. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Tesla K40c and Quadro K4200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Advices and comments
Here you can ask a question about Tesla K40c or Quadro K4200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.