ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145 vs Tesla K40c

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K40c with Mobility Radeon HD 5145, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K40c
2013, $7,699
12 GB GDDR5, 245 Watt
10.75
+2588%

K40c outperforms Mobility HD 5145 by a whopping 2588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4691328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency3.372.05
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK180M92
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288080
Core clock speed745 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate210.25.760
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs2408
L1 Cache240 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 31 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.75 0.40
Recency 8 October 2013 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 15 Watt

Tesla K40c has a 2587.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5145, on the other hand, has 1533.3% lower power consumption.

The Tesla K40c is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K40c is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5145 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Tesla K40c
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Mobility Radeon HD 5145

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate Tesla K40c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K40c or Mobility Radeon HD 5145, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.