GeForce2 Ti vs Tesla K40c

Place in the ranking	471	1588
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.11	no data
Power efficiency	3.38	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GK180	NV15 A5
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 October 2013 (12 years ago)	1 October 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	no data
Core clock speed	745 MHz	250 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,080 million	25 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	210.2	2.000
Floating-point processing power	5.046 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	240	8
L1 Cache	240 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1536 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	267 mm	165 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.103	N/A
CUDA	3.5	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla K40c 10.75
+107400%

GeForce2 Ti 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla K40c 4494
+112250%

Samples: 3

GeForce2 Ti 4
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.75	0.01
Recency	8 October 2013	1 October 2001
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm

Tesla K40c has a 107400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla K40c is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K40c is a workstation graphics card while GeForce2 Ti is a desktop one.