Radeon R7 260 vs Tesla K20c
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla K20c with Radeon R7 260, including specs and performance data.
K20c outperforms R7 260 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 552 | 594 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.16 | 3.29 |
| Power efficiency | 2.81 | 5.58 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | GK110 | Bonaire |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 (13 years ago) | 17 December 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | $109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
R7 260 has 1956% better value for money than Tesla K20c.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2496 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 146.8 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.524 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 16 |
| TMUs | 208 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1280 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB/s | 104 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DisplayPort support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | - | + |
| DDMA audio | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | - |
| CUDA | 3.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.24 | 6.91 |
| Recency | 12 November 2012 | 17 December 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
Tesla K20c has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.
R7 260, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 95.7% lower power consumption.
The Tesla K20c is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 260 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla K20c is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 260 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
