HD Graphics 4600 vs Tesla K20c

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K10 K20c K20m K20s K20X K20Xm K40c K40d K40m K40st K40t K80
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 3000 4000 4200 4400 4600 5000 5300 5500 5600 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K20c with HD Graphics 4600, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K20c
2012, $3,199
5 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
8.14
+385%

K20c outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by a whopping 385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking549982
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Power efficiency2.826.54
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameGK110Haswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)27 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496160
Core clock speed706 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate146.822.00
Floating-point processing power3.524 TFLOPS0.352 TFLOPS
ROPs402
TMUs20820
L1 Cache208 KBno data
L2 Cache1280 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p65−70
+364%
14
−364%
Full HD50−55
+355%
11
−355%

Cost per frame, $

1080p63.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
+0%
4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Tesla K20c and HD Graphics 4600 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla K20c is 364% faster in 900p
  • Tesla K20c is 355% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.14 1.68
Recency 12 November 2012 27 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 45 Watt

Tesla K20c has a 384.5% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 4600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Tesla K20c is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K20c is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
vs
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 610
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
ATI HD 4200 HD 4200
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Quadro P500 Quadro P500
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
K2100M Quadro K2100M
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
T600 T600
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
RTX 3060 GA104 RTX 3060 GA104
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 12 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2982 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K20c or HD Graphics 4600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.