ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition vs Tesla C2090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF110RV250
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)14 March 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed651 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate41.661.100
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 14 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Tesla C2090 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 792.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2090 and Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2090
Tesla C2090
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.