ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs Tesla C2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF110RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed651 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate41.660.96
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs644
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s5.248 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Tesla C2090 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 792.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2090 and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2090 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2090
Tesla C2090
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2090 or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.