RTX A4000 Max-Q vs Tesla C2075

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking486not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.52no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF110GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4485120
Core clock speed574 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14223.2
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS14.28 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs56160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s352.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 80 Watt

RTX A4000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 9 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 208.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and RTX A4000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation card while RTX A4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q
RTX A4000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.