Arctic Sound-M vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking561not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.51no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF110Arctic Sound
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4488192
Core clock speed574 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14230.4
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs56256
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 500 Watt

Tesla C2075 has 102% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.