ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 SE vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.50no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGF110R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)10 September 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed574 MHz378 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.141.512
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs564
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz297 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s9.504 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DVI, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 10 September 2003
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

Tesla C2075 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and All-In-Wonder 9800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9800 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075
ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 SE
All-In-Wonder 9800 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or All-In-Wonder 9800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.