Radeon E9173 PCIe vs Tesla C2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking574not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Lexa
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)3 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448512
Core clock speed574 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1439.01
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs5632
L1 Cache896 KB128 KB
L2 Cache768 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 3 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla C2070 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

E9173 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 580% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2070 and Radeon E9173 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2070 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E9173 PCIe is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe
Radeon E9173 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon E9173 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2070 or Radeon E9173 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.