GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs Tesla C2070

Place in the ranking	518	141
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.35	30.61
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF100	TU104
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	2560
Core clock speed	574 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	238 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	184.8
Floating-point processing power	1.028 TFLOPS	5.914 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	56	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	747 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.4 GB/s	352.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	2.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla C2070 8.12

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.52
+337%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla C2070 3120

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13650
+338%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −395%	104 +395%
1440p	16−18 −338%	70 +338%
4K	10−12 −390%	49 +390%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	89 +0%	89 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +0%	34 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 +0%	109 +0%
Valorant	157 +0%	157 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +0%	28 +0%
Dota 2	128 +0%	128 +0%
Far Cry 5	88 +0%	88 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 +0%	125 +0%
Metro Exodus	80 +0%	80 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	51 +0%	51 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Valorant	94 +0%	94 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Dota 2	127 +0%	127 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Valorant	136 +0%	136 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +0%	33 +0%
World of Tanks	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	76 +0%	76 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	75 +0%	75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	100 +0%	100 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	73 +0%	73 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	73 +0%	73 +0%
Metro Exodus	28 +0%	28 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21 +0%	21 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 +0%	73 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	103 +0%	103 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	51 +0%	51 +0%

This is how Tesla C2070 and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 395% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 338% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 390% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.12	35.52
Recency	25 July 2011	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	238 Watt	80 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has a 337.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 197.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla C2070 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla C2070 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.