Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs Tesla C2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking576not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGF100Apollo Lake GT1 5
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448144
Core clock speed574 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.14no data
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs483
TMUs5618
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed747 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2070 and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2070 is a workstation graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2070 or Apollo Lake GT1 5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.