Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics vs Tesla C2050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGF100Spectre SL
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)17 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448256
Core clock speed574 MHz626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data847 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1410.02
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.3205 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 17 Watt

R5 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation card while Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.