Radeon HD 8670A vs Tesla C2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking554not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.43no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Sun
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)2 February 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448320
Core clock speed574 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1412.00
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs5620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 2 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 45 Watt

Tesla C2050 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 8670A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 428.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and Radeon HD 8670A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8670A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
AMD Radeon HD 8670A
Radeon HD 8670A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2050 or Radeon HD 8670A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.