GeForce MX150 GP107 vs Tesla C2050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF100GP107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)23 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448384
Core clock speed574 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1532 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1436.77
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS1.177 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s48.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.06.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 23 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 25 Watt

Tesla C2050 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

MX150 GP107, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 852% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and GeForce MX150 GP107. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation card while GeForce MX150 GP107 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107
GeForce MX150 GP107

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 GP107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.