GeForce GT 430 PCI vs Tesla C2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF100GF108
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44896
Core clock speed574 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1411.20
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs5616
L1 Cache896 KB128 KB
L2 Cache768 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.02.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 49 Watt

Tesla C2050 has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 430 PCI, on the other hand, has 385.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and GeForce GT 430 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 430 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
GeForce GT 430 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2050 or GeForce GT 430 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.