ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs Tesla C2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.45no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGF100RV516
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed574 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate32.142.400
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs564
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Length248 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 32 Watt

Tesla C2050 has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1, on the other hand, has 643.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and FireMV 2250 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation graphics card while FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2050 or FireMV 2250 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.