Iris Plus Graphics vs Tegra 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.92
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTegra 2Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2010 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed400 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60032.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 33% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 2 and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 2 is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Tegra 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 493 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 2 or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.