Tegra 4 GPU vs Iris Plus Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking720not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Tegra 4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data1 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data672 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data11 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate32.002.688
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1IGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
OpenGL4.6ES 3.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 33% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics and Tegra 4 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 4 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 493 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics or Tegra 4 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.